Newsletter Subscribe
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

Interpressnews+1InterpressnewsInterpressnewsAt the Constitutional Court, United National Movement representative Ana Tsitlidze stated that the plaintiff side is challenging them regarding decisions made by people whom Georgian Dream itself appointed as judges for life. According to Tsitlidze's explanation, it is paradoxical that the activities of Murusidze and Chinchaladze are assessed as a crime before 2012, and as integrity after 2012. Interpressnews+1
Ana Tsitlidze acknowledged that there were problems in the judicial system during the National Movement's rule and that the system was not independent, but emphasized that the main architects of this system were precisely Levan Murusidze and Mikheil Chinchaladze. Interpressnews
At the hearing, Judge Revaz Nadaraia asked Ana Tsitlidze to clarify what she meant by the signing of decisions and their management by Murusidze and Chinchaladze. In response, Tsitlidze noted that she is relying on the plaintiff's argumentation, which speaks of control of the judicial system and systemic crimes. Interpressnews